Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction
2021
Download 🢃
Authors
Necci, MarcoPiovesan, Damiano
Tosatto, Silvio C. E.
Davidović, Radoslav S.
Veljković, Nevena V.
Contributors
CAID PredictorsDisProt Curators
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has F max = 0.483 on the full dataset and F max = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with F max = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude.
Source:
Nature Methods, 2021, 18, 5, 472-481Funding / projects:
- National Science Foundation (NSF) [1617369]
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [298328]
- Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission [13ZCZDGX01099]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970649]
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [11701296]
- Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin [18JCYBJC24900]
- Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development [16cm0106320h0001]
- Australian Research Council [DP180102060]
- Research Foundation Flanders [G.0328.16 N]
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-14-CE10-0021]
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-17-CE12-0016]
- Hungarian Ministry for Innovation and Technology ELTE Thematic Excellence Programme [ED-18-1-2019-0030]
- Hungarian Academy of Sciences 'Lendulet' grant [LP2014-18]
- Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [K124670]
- Hungarian Scientific Research Fund [K131702]
- European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [778247]. Funding for open access charge: European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [778247]
- Italian Ministry of University and Research - PRIN 2017 [2017483NH8]
- ELIXIR
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3
ISSN: 1548-7091
PubMed: 33875885
WoS: 000641237500004
Scopus: 2-s2.0-85104988931
Institution/Community
VinčaTY - JOUR AU - Necci, Marco AU - Piovesan, Damiano AU - Tosatto, Silvio C. E. AU - Davidović, Radoslav S. AU - Veljković, Nevena V. PY - 2021 UR - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9698 AB - Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has F max = 0.483 on the full dataset and F max = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with F max = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude. T2 - Nature Methods T1 - Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction VL - 18 IS - 5 SP - 472 EP - 481 DO - 10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 ER -
@article{
author = "Necci, Marco and Piovesan, Damiano and Tosatto, Silvio C. E. and Davidović, Radoslav S. and Veljković, Nevena V.",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Intrinsically disordered proteins, defying the traditional protein structure–function paradigm, are a challenge to study experimentally. Because a large part of our knowledge rests on computational predictions, it is crucial that their accuracy is high. The Critical Assessment of protein Intrinsic Disorder prediction (CAID) experiment was established as a community-based blind test to determine the state of the art in prediction of intrinsically disordered regions and the subset of residues involved in binding. A total of 43 methods were evaluated on a dataset of 646 proteins from DisProt. The best methods use deep learning techniques and notably outperform physicochemical methods. The top disorder predictor has F max = 0.483 on the full dataset and F max = 0.792 following filtering out of bona fide structured regions. Disordered binding regions remain hard to predict, with F max = 0.231. Interestingly, computing times among methods can vary by up to four orders of magnitude.",
journal = "Nature Methods",
title = "Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction",
volume = "18",
number = "5",
pages = "472-481",
doi = "10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3"
}
Necci, M., Piovesan, D., Tosatto, S. C. E., Davidović, R. S.,& Veljković, N. V.. (2021). Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction. in Nature Methods, 18(5), 472-481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3
Necci M, Piovesan D, Tosatto SCE, Davidović RS, Veljković NV. Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction. in Nature Methods. 2021;18(5):472-481. doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 .
Necci, Marco, Piovesan, Damiano, Tosatto, Silvio C. E., Davidović, Radoslav S., Veljković, Nevena V., "Critical assessment of protein intrinsic disorder prediction" in Nature Methods, 18, no. 5 (2021):472-481, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-021-01117-3 . .


