Inter-comparison of dynamic models for radionuclide transfer to marine biota in a Fukushima accident scenario
Samo za registrovane korisnike
2016
Autori
Vives i Batlle, J.Beresford, N. A.
Beaugelin-Seiller, K.
Bezhenar, R.
Brown, J.
Cheng, J. -J.
Ćujić, Mirjana
Dragović, Snežana D.
Duffa, C.
Fievet, B.
Hosseini, A.
Jung, K. T.
Kamboj, S.
Keum, D. -K.
Kryshev, A.
LePoire, D.
Maderich, V.
Min, B. -I.
Perianez, R.
Sazykina, T.
Suh, K-S.
Yu, C.
Wang, C.
Heling, R.
Članak u časopisu (Objavljena verzija)
Metapodaci
Prikaz svih podataka o dokumentuApstrakt
We report an inter-comparison of eight models designed to predict the radiological exposure of radionuclides in marine biota. The models were required to simulate dynamically the uptake and turnover of radionuclides by marine organisms. Model predictions of radionuclide uptake and turnover using kinetic calculations based on biological half-life (T-B1/2) and/or more complex metabolic modelling approaches were used to predict activity concentrations and, consequently, dose rates of Sr-90, I-131 and Cs-137 to fish, crustaceans, macroalgae and molluscs under circumstances where the water concentrations are changing with time. For comparison, the ERICA Tool, a model commonly used in environmental assessment, and which uses equilibrium concentration ratios, was also used. As input to the models we used hydrodynamic forecasts of water and sediment activity concentrations using a simulated scenario reflecting the Fukushima accident releases. Although model variability is important, the interc...omparison gives logical results, in that the dynamic models predict consistently a pattern of delayed rise of activity concentration in biota and slow decline instead of the instantaneous equilibrium with the activity concentration in seawater predicted by the ERICA Tool. The differences between ERICA and the dynamic models increase the shorter the T-B1/2 becomes; however, there is significant variability between models, underpinned by parameter and methodological differences between them. The need to validate the dynamic models used in this intercomparison has been highlighted, particularly in regards to optimisation of the model biokinetic parameters. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Ključne reči:
Dynamic model / Dose rate / Fukushima / Marine biota / Radionuclide transfer / MODARIAIzvor:
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2016, 153, 31-50Izdavač:
- Elsevier
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.006
ISSN: 0265-931X; 1879-1700
WoS: 000371944700005
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84950274774
Kolekcije
Institucija/grupa
VinčaTY - JOUR AU - Vives i Batlle, J. AU - Beresford, N. A. AU - Beaugelin-Seiller, K. AU - Bezhenar, R. AU - Brown, J. AU - Cheng, J. -J. AU - Ćujić, Mirjana AU - Dragović, Snežana D. AU - Duffa, C. AU - Fievet, B. AU - Hosseini, A. AU - Jung, K. T. AU - Kamboj, S. AU - Keum, D. -K. AU - Kryshev, A. AU - LePoire, D. AU - Maderich, V. AU - Min, B. -I. AU - Perianez, R. AU - Sazykina, T. AU - Suh, K-S. AU - Yu, C. AU - Wang, C. AU - Heling, R. PY - 2016 UR - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/964 AB - We report an inter-comparison of eight models designed to predict the radiological exposure of radionuclides in marine biota. The models were required to simulate dynamically the uptake and turnover of radionuclides by marine organisms. Model predictions of radionuclide uptake and turnover using kinetic calculations based on biological half-life (T-B1/2) and/or more complex metabolic modelling approaches were used to predict activity concentrations and, consequently, dose rates of Sr-90, I-131 and Cs-137 to fish, crustaceans, macroalgae and molluscs under circumstances where the water concentrations are changing with time. For comparison, the ERICA Tool, a model commonly used in environmental assessment, and which uses equilibrium concentration ratios, was also used. As input to the models we used hydrodynamic forecasts of water and sediment activity concentrations using a simulated scenario reflecting the Fukushima accident releases. Although model variability is important, the intercomparison gives logical results, in that the dynamic models predict consistently a pattern of delayed rise of activity concentration in biota and slow decline instead of the instantaneous equilibrium with the activity concentration in seawater predicted by the ERICA Tool. The differences between ERICA and the dynamic models increase the shorter the T-B1/2 becomes; however, there is significant variability between models, underpinned by parameter and methodological differences between them. The need to validate the dynamic models used in this intercomparison has been highlighted, particularly in regards to optimisation of the model biokinetic parameters. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. PB - Elsevier T2 - Journal of Environmental Radioactivity T1 - Inter-comparison of dynamic models for radionuclide transfer to marine biota in a Fukushima accident scenario VL - 153 SP - 31 EP - 50 DO - 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.006 ER -
@article{ author = "Vives i Batlle, J. and Beresford, N. A. and Beaugelin-Seiller, K. and Bezhenar, R. and Brown, J. and Cheng, J. -J. and Ćujić, Mirjana and Dragović, Snežana D. and Duffa, C. and Fievet, B. and Hosseini, A. and Jung, K. T. and Kamboj, S. and Keum, D. -K. and Kryshev, A. and LePoire, D. and Maderich, V. and Min, B. -I. and Perianez, R. and Sazykina, T. and Suh, K-S. and Yu, C. and Wang, C. and Heling, R.", year = "2016", abstract = "We report an inter-comparison of eight models designed to predict the radiological exposure of radionuclides in marine biota. The models were required to simulate dynamically the uptake and turnover of radionuclides by marine organisms. Model predictions of radionuclide uptake and turnover using kinetic calculations based on biological half-life (T-B1/2) and/or more complex metabolic modelling approaches were used to predict activity concentrations and, consequently, dose rates of Sr-90, I-131 and Cs-137 to fish, crustaceans, macroalgae and molluscs under circumstances where the water concentrations are changing with time. For comparison, the ERICA Tool, a model commonly used in environmental assessment, and which uses equilibrium concentration ratios, was also used. As input to the models we used hydrodynamic forecasts of water and sediment activity concentrations using a simulated scenario reflecting the Fukushima accident releases. Although model variability is important, the intercomparison gives logical results, in that the dynamic models predict consistently a pattern of delayed rise of activity concentration in biota and slow decline instead of the instantaneous equilibrium with the activity concentration in seawater predicted by the ERICA Tool. The differences between ERICA and the dynamic models increase the shorter the T-B1/2 becomes; however, there is significant variability between models, underpinned by parameter and methodological differences between them. The need to validate the dynamic models used in this intercomparison has been highlighted, particularly in regards to optimisation of the model biokinetic parameters. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.", publisher = "Elsevier", journal = "Journal of Environmental Radioactivity", title = "Inter-comparison of dynamic models for radionuclide transfer to marine biota in a Fukushima accident scenario", volume = "153", pages = "31-50", doi = "10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.006" }
Vives i Batlle, J., Beresford, N. A., Beaugelin-Seiller, K., Bezhenar, R., Brown, J., Cheng, J. -J., Ćujić, M., Dragović, S. D., Duffa, C., Fievet, B., Hosseini, A., Jung, K. T., Kamboj, S., Keum, D. -K., Kryshev, A., LePoire, D., Maderich, V., Min, B. -I., Perianez, R., Sazykina, T., Suh, K-S., Yu, C., Wang, C.,& Heling, R.. (2016). Inter-comparison of dynamic models for radionuclide transfer to marine biota in a Fukushima accident scenario. in Journal of Environmental Radioactivity Elsevier., 153, 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.006
Vives i Batlle J, Beresford NA, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Bezhenar R, Brown J, Cheng J-, Ćujić M, Dragović SD, Duffa C, Fievet B, Hosseini A, Jung KT, Kamboj S, Keum D-, Kryshev A, LePoire D, Maderich V, Min B-, Perianez R, Sazykina T, Suh K, Yu C, Wang C, Heling R. Inter-comparison of dynamic models for radionuclide transfer to marine biota in a Fukushima accident scenario. in Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 2016;153:31-50. doi:10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.006 .
Vives i Batlle, J., Beresford, N. A., Beaugelin-Seiller, K., Bezhenar, R., Brown, J., Cheng, J. -J., Ćujić, Mirjana, Dragović, Snežana D., Duffa, C., Fievet, B., Hosseini, A., Jung, K. T., Kamboj, S., Keum, D. -K., Kryshev, A., LePoire, D., Maderich, V., Min, B. -I., Perianez, R., Sazykina, T., Suh, K-S., Yu, C., Wang, C., Heling, R., "Inter-comparison of dynamic models for radionuclide transfer to marine biota in a Fukushima accident scenario" in Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 153 (2016):31-50, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.006 . .