Show simple item record

dc.creatorCiraj-Bjelac, Olivera
dc.creatorAvramova-Cholakova, Simona
dc.creatorBeganovic, Adnan
dc.creatorEconomides, Sotirios
dc.creatorFaj, Dario
dc.creatorGershan, Vesna
dc.creatorGrupetta, Edward
dc.creatorKharita, M. H.
dc.creatorMilakovic, Milomir
dc.creatorMilu, Constantin
dc.creatorMuhogora, Wilbroad E.
dc.creatorMuthuvelu, Pirunthavany
dc.creatorOola, Samuel
dc.creatorSetayeshi, Saeid
dc.creatorSchandorf, Cyril
dc.creatorUrsulean, Ion
dc.creatorVidenovic, Ivan R.
dc.creatorZaman, Areesha
dc.creatorZiliukas, Julius
dc.creatorRehani, Madan M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-01T22:42:30Z
dc.date.available2018-03-01T22:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn0720-048X (print)
dc.identifier.urihttp://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4996
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective is to study mammography practice from an optimisation point of view by assessing the impact of simple and immediately implementable corrective actions on image quality. Materials and methods: This prospective multinational study included 54 mammography units in 17 countries. More than 21,000 mammography images were evaluated using a three-level image quality scoring system. Following initial assessment, appropriate corrective actions were implemented and image quality was re-assessed in 24 units. Results: The fraction of images that were considered acceptable without any remark in the first phase (before the implementation of corrective actions) was 70% and 75% for cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique projections, respectively. The main causes for poor image quality before corrective actions were related to film processing, damaged or scratched image receptors, or film-screen combinations that are not spectrally matched, inappropriate radiographic techniques and lack of training. Average glandular dose to a standard breast was 1.5mGy (mean and range 0.59-3.2 mGy). After optimisation the frequency of poor quality images decreased, but the relative contributions of the various causes remained similar. Image quality improvements following appropriate corrective actions were up to 50 percentage points in some facilities. Conclusions: Poor image quality is a major source of unnecessary radiation dose to the breast. An increased awareness of good quality mammograms is of particular importance for countries that are moving towards introduction of population-based screening programmes. The study demonstrated how simple and low-cost measures can be a valuable tool in improving of image quality in mammography. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.en
dc.relationInternational Atomic Energy Agency (Africa) [RAF/9/033], International Atomic Energy Agency (Asia) [RAS/9/9034, RAS/9/9040], International Atomic Energy Agency (Europe) [RER/9/079, RER/9/080]
dc.rightsrestrictedAccessen
dc.sourceEuropean Journal of Radiologyen
dc.subjectMammographyen
dc.subjectImage qualityen
dc.subjectRadiation doseen
dc.subjectQA mammographyen
dc.titleImage quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: Results from IAEA projectsen
dc.typearticleen
dcterms.abstractЗилиукас, Јулиус; Сцхандорф, Цyрил; Урсулеан, Ион; Цирај-Бјелац Оливера; Бегановиц, Aднан; Мухогора, Wилброад Е.; Милу, Цонстантин; Милаковиц, Миломир; Aврамова-Цхолакова, Симона; Ецономидес, Сотириос; Фај, Дарио; Герсхан, Весна; Групетта, Едwард; Кхарита, М. Х.; Рехани, Мадан М.; Заман, Aреесха; Виденовиц, Иван Р.; Мутхувелу, Пирунтхаванy; Оола, Самуел; Сетаyесхи, Саеид;
dc.citation.volume81
dc.citation.issue9
dc.citation.spage2161
dc.citation.epage2168
dc.identifier.wos000307670000039
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.026
dc.citation.rankM22
dc.identifier.pmid21665395
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84864646028


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record