Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorMuhogora, Wilbroad E.
dc.creatorAhmed, Nada A.
dc.creatorAlmosabihi, Aziz
dc.creatorAlsuwaidi, Jamila S.
dc.creatorBeganovic, Adnan
dc.creatorCiraj-Bjelac, Olivera
dc.creatorKabuya, Francois K.
dc.creatorKrisanachinda, Anchali
dc.creatorMilakovic, Milomir
dc.creatorMukwada, Godfrey
dc.creatorRamanandraibe, Marie J.
dc.creatorRehani, Madan M.
dc.creatorRouzitalab, Jalil
dc.creatorShandorf, Cyril
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-01T20:25:43Z
dc.date.available2018-03-01T20:25:43Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn0361-803X
dc.identifier.urihttps://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/3448
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to survey image quality and the entrance surface air kerma for patients in radiographic examinations and to perform comparisons with diagnostic reference levels. SUBJECTS and METHODS. In this multinational prospective study, image quality and patient radiation doses were surveyed in 12 countries in Africa, Asia, and Eastern Europe, covering 45 hospitals. The rate of unsatisfactory images and image quality grade were noted, and causes for poor image quality were investigated. The entrance surface doses for adult patients were determined in terms of the entrance surface air kerma on the basis of X-ray tube output measurements and X-ray exposure parameters. Comparison of dose levels with diagnostic reference levels was performed. RESULTS. The fraction of images rated as poor was as high as 53%. The image quality improved up to 16 percentage points in Africa, 13 in Asia, and 22 in Eastern Europe after implementation of a quality control ( QC) program. Patient doses varied by a factor of up to 88, although the majority of doses were below diagnostic reference levels. The mean entrance surface air kerma values in mGy were 0.33 ( chest, posteroanterior), 4.07 ( lumbar spine, anteroposterior), 8.53 ( lumbar spine, lateral), 3.64 ( abdomen, anteroposterior), 3.68 ( pelvis, anteroposterior), and 2.41 ( skull, anteroposterior). Patient doses were found to be similar to doses in developed countries and patient dose reductions ranging from 1.4% to 85% were achieved. CONCLUSION. Poor image quality constitutes a major source of unnecessary radiation to patients in developing countries. Comparison with other surveys indicates that patient dose levels in these countries are not higher than those in developed countries.en
dc.rightsrestrictedAccessen
dc.sourceAmerican Journal of Roentgenologyen
dc.subjectpatient dosesen
dc.subjectquality assuranceen
dc.subjectradiation protectionen
dc.subjectradiation safetyen
dc.subjectradiographyen
dc.titlePatient doses in radiographic examinations in 12 countries in Asia, Africa, and Eastern Europe: Initial results from IAEA projectsen
dc.typearticleen
dcterms.abstractAлмосабихи, Aзиз; Aлсуwаиди, Јамила С.; Крисанацхинда, Aнцхали; Милаковиц, Миломир; Мукwада, Годфреy; Раманандраибе, Марие Ј.; Рехани, Мадан М.; Роузиталаб, Јалил; Схандорф, Цyрил; Бегановиц, Aднан; Кабуyа, Францоис К.; Мухогора, Wилброад Е.; Aхмед, Нада A.; Цирај-Бјелац Оливера;
dc.citation.volume190
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.spage1453
dc.citation.epage1461
dc.identifier.wos000256064700011
dc.identifier.doi10.2214/AJR.07.3039
dc.citation.rankM21
dc.identifier.pmid18492891
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-44949220075


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу