VinaR - Repository of the Vinča Nuclear Institute
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Vinar
  • Vinča
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
  •   Vinar
  • Vinča
  • Radovi istraživača
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types

Thumbnail
2022
Main article [PDF] (3.754Mb)
Authors
Balvanović, Roman V.
Šmit, Žiga
Article (Published version)
,
© 2022 by the authors
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Resolving issues posed by our paper describing the late antiquity glass from Jelica (Serbia), we performed a thorough analysis of similar glass, systematically collected from the literature. The analysis showed that Foy 3.2 type evolved gradually from a composition similar to the Roman an-timony-decolorized glass to a composition approaching Foy 2.1, lasting longer (second−seventh century AD) and spreading wider than originally described, including large parts of the Balkans, France interior, Germany, and Britain. The center of its distribution seems to be the Balkans and Italy. During the sixth century, Foy 3.2 glasses in the Balkans showed a significant increase of average MgO concentration compared to the earlier period and Foy 3.2 glasses outside the Balkans, implying different sand quarries and perhaps different trade routes for its imports. Recycling criteria for Foy 3.2 glass has been established. Similarly, 125 high-iron Foy 2.1 glasses are selected from the literature. They cl...uster within two groups regarding iron concentrations, which we term high iron (HI) and very high iron (VHI) Foy 2.1. In addition, there is a low lime subgroup of the VHI group, termed VHILL. The paper offers two possible explanations for the elevated iron, color branding, and different silica sources. High-iron glasses seem relatively evenly spread across the entire Mediterranean and its interior, representing, on average, around a quarter of the local Foy 2.1 assemblages. The percentages of high-iron samples are almost double in manufactured glass compared to raw glass, suggesting that the addition of iron was happening in the secondary workshops, i.e., for color branding. Among the manufactured glass, the proportions were higher in glassware than in win-dowpane glass. To capture the changing sand exploitation conditions, we propose the term “generic composition/type” or “(geochemical) class”. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

Keywords:
late antiquity / Foy 3.2 / Foy 2.1 / Fe-rich / color-branding / Balkans
Source:
Materials, 2022, 15, 3, 1086-
Funding / projects:
  • Physics and Chemistry with Ion Beams (RS-45006)

DOI: 10.3390/ma15031086

ISSN: 1996-1944

WoS: 000760101300001

Scopus: 2-s2.0-85123639683
[ Google Scholar ]
URI
https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10150
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača
Institution/Community
Vinča
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Balvanović, Roman V.
AU  - Šmit, Žiga
PY  - 2022
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/10150
AB  - Resolving issues posed by our paper describing the late antiquity glass from Jelica (Serbia), we performed a thorough analysis of similar glass, systematically collected from the literature. The analysis showed that Foy 3.2 type evolved gradually from a composition similar to the Roman an-timony-decolorized glass to a composition approaching Foy 2.1, lasting longer (second−seventh century AD) and spreading wider than originally described, including large parts of the Balkans, France interior, Germany, and Britain. The center of its distribution seems to be the Balkans and Italy. During the sixth century, Foy 3.2 glasses in the Balkans showed a significant increase of average MgO concentration compared to the earlier period and Foy 3.2 glasses outside the Balkans, implying different sand quarries and perhaps different trade routes for its imports. Recycling criteria for Foy 3.2 glass has been established. Similarly, 125 high-iron Foy 2.1 glasses are selected from the literature. They cluster within two groups regarding iron concentrations, which we term high iron (HI) and very high iron (VHI) Foy 2.1. In addition, there is a low lime subgroup of the VHI group, termed VHILL. The paper offers two possible explanations for the elevated iron, color branding, and different silica sources. High-iron glasses seem relatively evenly spread across the entire Mediterranean and its interior, representing, on average, around a quarter of the local Foy 2.1 assemblages. The percentages of high-iron samples are almost double in manufactured glass compared to raw glass, suggesting that the addition of iron was happening in the secondary workshops, i.e., for color branding. Among the manufactured glass, the proportions were higher in glassware than in win-dowpane glass. To capture the changing sand exploitation conditions, we propose the term “generic composition/type” or “(geochemical) class”. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
T2  - Materials
T2  - Materials
T1  - Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types
VL  - 15
IS  - 3
SP  - 1086
DO  - 10.3390/ma15031086
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Balvanović, Roman V. and Šmit, Žiga",
year = "2022",
abstract = "Resolving issues posed by our paper describing the late antiquity glass from Jelica (Serbia), we performed a thorough analysis of similar glass, systematically collected from the literature. The analysis showed that Foy 3.2 type evolved gradually from a composition similar to the Roman an-timony-decolorized glass to a composition approaching Foy 2.1, lasting longer (second−seventh century AD) and spreading wider than originally described, including large parts of the Balkans, France interior, Germany, and Britain. The center of its distribution seems to be the Balkans and Italy. During the sixth century, Foy 3.2 glasses in the Balkans showed a significant increase of average MgO concentration compared to the earlier period and Foy 3.2 glasses outside the Balkans, implying different sand quarries and perhaps different trade routes for its imports. Recycling criteria for Foy 3.2 glass has been established. Similarly, 125 high-iron Foy 2.1 glasses are selected from the literature. They cluster within two groups regarding iron concentrations, which we term high iron (HI) and very high iron (VHI) Foy 2.1. In addition, there is a low lime subgroup of the VHI group, termed VHILL. The paper offers two possible explanations for the elevated iron, color branding, and different silica sources. High-iron glasses seem relatively evenly spread across the entire Mediterranean and its interior, representing, on average, around a quarter of the local Foy 2.1 assemblages. The percentages of high-iron samples are almost double in manufactured glass compared to raw glass, suggesting that the addition of iron was happening in the secondary workshops, i.e., for color branding. Among the manufactured glass, the proportions were higher in glassware than in win-dowpane glass. To capture the changing sand exploitation conditions, we propose the term “generic composition/type” or “(geochemical) class”. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.",
journal = "Materials, Materials",
title = "Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types",
volume = "15",
number = "3",
pages = "1086",
doi = "10.3390/ma15031086"
}
Balvanović, R. V.,& Šmit, Ž.. (2022). Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types. in Materials, 15(3), 1086.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031086
Balvanović RV, Šmit Ž. Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types. in Materials. 2022;15(3):1086.
doi:10.3390/ma15031086 .
Balvanović, Roman V., Šmit, Žiga, "Emerging Glass Industry Patterns in Late Antiquity Balkans and Beyond: New analytical Findings on Foy 3.2 and Foy 2.1 Glass Types" in Materials, 15, no. 3 (2022):1086,
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15031086 . .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the VinaR Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About the VinaR Repository | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB