Research and development of the platform for science based management of the scientific and technological development of the Republic of Serbia

Link to this page

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)/47005/RS//

Research and development of the platform for science based management of the scientific and technological development of the Republic of Serbia (en)
Истраживање и развој платформе за научну подршку у одлучивању и управљању научним и технолошким развојем у Србији (sr)
Istraživanje i razvoj platforme za naučnu podršku u odlučivanju i upravljanju naučnim i tehnološkim razvojem u Srbiji (sr_RS)
Authors

Publications

Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe

Babić, Dragan; Kutlača, Đuro; Živković, Lazar; Štrbac, Dijana; Semenčenko, Dušica

(Springer, 2016)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Babić, Dragan
AU  - Kutlača, Đuro
AU  - Živković, Lazar
AU  - Štrbac, Dijana
AU  - Semenčenko, Dušica
PY  - 2016
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/891
AB  - Scientific productivity data (number of publications and h-indices), collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database for the period 2005-2010 for 13 countries of Southeast Europe (including Austria as the reference country) and for the 251 WoS categories were grouped, during extraction of data, into 41 fields of science (FoS) according to Frascati manual classification (OECD in Revised field of science and technology (FoS) classification in the Frascati manual, pp. 1-12, 2007). The Scientific Performance QuaLity (SPQL) level has been defined and calculated for the 13 studied countries and for all FoS based on the established best fit of the linear dependence between P (1/alpha) and h-index. From these data the SPQL levels of the six major fields and overall country levels have been generated in a way which makes them dependent not on the quantity of scientific publications output, but on its quality thus making them suitable for constructing conceivable science policies. Nevertheless, general observed trend shows growth of the quality of scientific performance (SPQL) with scientific production output, but there are evident exceptions from such a tendency in both positive and negative directions. The highest quality levels of the reached scientific performance have been identified for the 41 FoSs (subfields) and 6 major FoS by the countries concerned.
PB  - Springer
T2  - Scientometrics
T1  - Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe
VL  - 106
IS  - 1
SP  - 405
EP  - 434
DO  - 10.1007/s11192-015-1649-8
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Babić, Dragan and Kutlača, Đuro and Živković, Lazar and Štrbac, Dijana and Semenčenko, Dušica",
year = "2016",
abstract = "Scientific productivity data (number of publications and h-indices), collected from the Web of Science (WoS) database for the period 2005-2010 for 13 countries of Southeast Europe (including Austria as the reference country) and for the 251 WoS categories were grouped, during extraction of data, into 41 fields of science (FoS) according to Frascati manual classification (OECD in Revised field of science and technology (FoS) classification in the Frascati manual, pp. 1-12, 2007). The Scientific Performance QuaLity (SPQL) level has been defined and calculated for the 13 studied countries and for all FoS based on the established best fit of the linear dependence between P (1/alpha) and h-index. From these data the SPQL levels of the six major fields and overall country levels have been generated in a way which makes them dependent not on the quantity of scientific publications output, but on its quality thus making them suitable for constructing conceivable science policies. Nevertheless, general observed trend shows growth of the quality of scientific performance (SPQL) with scientific production output, but there are evident exceptions from such a tendency in both positive and negative directions. The highest quality levels of the reached scientific performance have been identified for the 41 FoSs (subfields) and 6 major FoS by the countries concerned.",
publisher = "Springer",
journal = "Scientometrics",
title = "Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe",
volume = "106",
number = "1",
pages = "405-434",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-015-1649-8"
}
Babić, D., Kutlača, Đ., Živković, L., Štrbac, D.,& Semenčenko, D.. (2016). Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe. in Scientometrics
Springer., 106(1), 405-434.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1649-8
Babić D, Kutlača Đ, Živković L, Štrbac D, Semenčenko D. Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe. in Scientometrics. 2016;106(1):405-434.
doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1649-8 .
Babić, Dragan, Kutlača, Đuro, Živković, Lazar, Štrbac, Dijana, Semenčenko, Dušica, "Evaluation of the quality of scientific performance of the selected countries of Southeast Europe" in Scientometrics, 106, no. 1 (2016):405-434,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1649-8 . .
9
9
13

Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output

Kutlaca, Djuro; Babić, Dragan; Živković, Lazar; Štrbac, Dijana

(2015)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Kutlaca, Djuro
AU  - Babić, Dragan
AU  - Živković, Lazar
AU  - Štrbac, Dijana
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/335
AB  - This paper provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the South East European countries scientific output and impact by Frascati fields of science in the period of 2005-2010. The aim is to determine the volume of scientific output in the mentioned period, level of development of certain scientific fields in selected countries and quality of scientific publication production. SEE countries scientific performance is examined on several indicators including total number of country publications per full time equivalent researcher, revealed publication advantage, the h index and top cited articles. Results of the study could be especially significant to the planners and policy-makers because they provide facts important for the long term S and T planning of the country.
T2  - Scientometrics
T1  - Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output
VL  - 102
IS  - 1
SP  - 247
EP  - 265
DO  - 10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Kutlaca, Djuro and Babić, Dragan and Živković, Lazar and Štrbac, Dijana",
year = "2015",
abstract = "This paper provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of the South East European countries scientific output and impact by Frascati fields of science in the period of 2005-2010. The aim is to determine the volume of scientific output in the mentioned period, level of development of certain scientific fields in selected countries and quality of scientific publication production. SEE countries scientific performance is examined on several indicators including total number of country publications per full time equivalent researcher, revealed publication advantage, the h index and top cited articles. Results of the study could be especially significant to the planners and policy-makers because they provide facts important for the long term S and T planning of the country.",
journal = "Scientometrics",
title = "Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output",
volume = "102",
number = "1",
pages = "247-265",
doi = "10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y"
}
Kutlaca, D., Babić, D., Živković, L.,& Štrbac, D.. (2015). Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output. in Scientometrics, 102(1), 247-265.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y
Kutlaca D, Babić D, Živković L, Štrbac D. Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output. in Scientometrics. 2015;102(1):247-265.
doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y .
Kutlaca, Djuro, Babić, Dragan, Živković, Lazar, Štrbac, Dijana, "Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output" in Scientometrics, 102, no. 1 (2015):247-265,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1290-y . .
15
10
16