Diastolic heart failure in cardiomyopathies, diabetes, pericardial diseases, and pulmonary hypertension: diagnostic criteria, risk stratification and therapeutic modalities

Link to this page

http://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/APP/faces/project.xhtml?project_id=info%3Aeu-repo%2FgrantAgreement%2FMESTD%2FBasic+Research+%28BR+or+ON%29%2F175080%2FRS%2F%2F&item_offset=0&author_offset=0&sort_by=dc.date.issued

info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MESTD/Basic Research (BR or ON)/175080/RS//

Diastolic heart failure in cardiomyopathies, diabetes, pericardial diseases, and pulmonary hypertension: diagnostic criteria, risk stratification and therapeutic modalities (en)
Дијастолна срчана инсуфицијенција у кардиомиопатијама, дијабетесу, болестима перикарда и плућној хипертензији: дијагностички критеријуми, стратификација ризика и терапијски модалитети (sr)
Dijastolna srčana insuficijencija u kardiomiopatijama, dijabetesu, bolestima perikarda i plućnoj hipertenziji: dijagnostički kriterijumi, stratifikacija rizika i terapijski modaliteti (sr_RS)
Authors

Publications

Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients

Jablanovic, Dragoslav; Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera; Damjanov, Nemanja; Seric, Srdjan; Radak-Perović, Marija; Aranđić, Danijela; Maksimović, Ružica

(2013) 

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Jablanovic, Dragoslav
AU  - Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
AU  - Damjanov, Nemanja
AU  - Seric, Srdjan
AU  - Radak-Perović, Marija
AU  - Aranđić, Danijela
AU  - Maksimović, Ružica
PY  - 2013
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5543
AB  - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the image quality and dose to patients in the radiography of sacroiliac joints and to perform a clinical comparative study of digital and conventional screen-film radiography. Routine radiography of sacroiliac joint was performed in 60 patients using digital and screen-film radiography. The visibility of five anatomical regions and the overall image quality were rated by experienced radiologists. Patient dose assessment in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was performed. The digital system showed slightly improved visualisation of specific anatomical structures. Overall image quality was significantly better in the digital when compared with the screen-film imaging system. The average ESAK was 2.4 mGy in screen-film and 3.6 mGy in digital radiography. The digital radiography provided equal or better visibility of anatomical details and overall image quality, but on higher dose levels. Therefore, the practice on digital systems must be optimised.
T2  - Radiation Protection Dosimetry
T1  - Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients
VL  - 155
IS  - 1
SP  - 88
EP  - 95
DO  - 10.1093/rpd/ncs315
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Jablanovic, Dragoslav and Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera and Damjanov, Nemanja and Seric, Srdjan and Radak-Perović, Marija and Aranđić, Danijela and Maksimović, Ružica",
year = "2013",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the image quality and dose to patients in the radiography of sacroiliac joints and to perform a clinical comparative study of digital and conventional screen-film radiography. Routine radiography of sacroiliac joint was performed in 60 patients using digital and screen-film radiography. The visibility of five anatomical regions and the overall image quality were rated by experienced radiologists. Patient dose assessment in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was performed. The digital system showed slightly improved visualisation of specific anatomical structures. Overall image quality was significantly better in the digital when compared with the screen-film imaging system. The average ESAK was 2.4 mGy in screen-film and 3.6 mGy in digital radiography. The digital radiography provided equal or better visibility of anatomical details and overall image quality, but on higher dose levels. Therefore, the practice on digital systems must be optimised.",
journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry",
title = "Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients",
volume = "155",
number = "1",
pages = "88-95",
doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncs315"
}
Jablanovic, D., Ciraj-Bjelac, O., Damjanov, N., Seric, S., Radak-Perović, M., Aranđić, D.,& Maksimović, R.. (2013). Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients. in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 155(1), 88-95.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs315
Jablanovic D, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Damjanov N, Seric S, Radak-Perović M, Aranđić D, Maksimović R. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients. in Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2013;155(1):88-95.
doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs315 .
Jablanovic, Dragoslav, Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera, Damjanov, Nemanja, Seric, Srdjan, Radak-Perović, Marija, Aranđić, Danijela, Maksimović, Ružica, "Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients" in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 155, no. 1 (2013):88-95,
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs315 . .
1
2