Kollaard, Robert

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
8e0df666-c76b-406f-9372-202abd66c491
  • Kollaard, Robert (1)
Projects
No records found.

Author's Bibliography

A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used

Carinou, Eleftheria; Kollaard, Robert; Stanković-Petrović, Jelena S.; Ginjaume, Merce

(2019)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Carinou, Eleftheria
AU  - Kollaard, Robert
AU  - Stanković-Petrović, Jelena S.
AU  - Ginjaume, Merce
PY  - 2019
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9021
AB  - Following the proposal of the ICRP for the reduction of the dose limit for the lens of the eye, which has been adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Council, concerns have been raised about the implementation of proper dose monitoring methods as defined in national regulations, and about the harmonisation between European countries. The European Radiation Dosimetry Group organised a survey at the end of 2017, through a web questionnaire, regarding national dose monitoring regulations. The questions were related to: double dosimetry, algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose, methodology for the determination of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye and structure of the national dose registry. The results showed that more than 50% of the countries that responded to the survey have legal requirements about the number and the position of dosemeters used for estimation of the effective dose when radiation protection garments are used. However, in only five out of 26 countries are there nationally approved algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose. In 14 out of 26 countries there is a legal requirement to estimate the dose to the lens of the eye. All of the responding countries use some kind of national database for storing individual monitoring data but in only 12 out of 26 countries are the estimated effective dose values stored. The personal dose equivalent at depth 3 mm is stored in the registry of only seven out of 26 countries. From the survey, performed just before the implementation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive, it is concluded that national occupational exposure frameworks require intensive and immediate work under the coordination of the competent authorities to bring them into line with the latest basic safety standards and achieve harmonisation between European countries.
T2  - Journal of Radiological Protection
T1  - A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used
VL  - 39
IS  - 1
SP  - 126
EP  - 135
DO  - 10.1088/1361-6498/aaf456
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Carinou, Eleftheria and Kollaard, Robert and Stanković-Petrović, Jelena S. and Ginjaume, Merce",
year = "2019",
abstract = "Following the proposal of the ICRP for the reduction of the dose limit for the lens of the eye, which has been adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency and the European Council, concerns have been raised about the implementation of proper dose monitoring methods as defined in national regulations, and about the harmonisation between European countries. The European Radiation Dosimetry Group organised a survey at the end of 2017, through a web questionnaire, regarding national dose monitoring regulations. The questions were related to: double dosimetry, algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose, methodology for the determination of the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye and structure of the national dose registry. The results showed that more than 50% of the countries that responded to the survey have legal requirements about the number and the position of dosemeters used for estimation of the effective dose when radiation protection garments are used. However, in only five out of 26 countries are there nationally approved algorithms for the estimation of the effective dose. In 14 out of 26 countries there is a legal requirement to estimate the dose to the lens of the eye. All of the responding countries use some kind of national database for storing individual monitoring data but in only 12 out of 26 countries are the estimated effective dose values stored. The personal dose equivalent at depth 3 mm is stored in the registry of only seven out of 26 countries. From the survey, performed just before the implementation of the European Basic Safety Standards Directive, it is concluded that national occupational exposure frameworks require intensive and immediate work under the coordination of the competent authorities to bring them into line with the latest basic safety standards and achieve harmonisation between European countries.",
journal = "Journal of Radiological Protection",
title = "A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used",
volume = "39",
number = "1",
pages = "126-135",
doi = "10.1088/1361-6498/aaf456"
}
Carinou, E., Kollaard, R., Stanković-Petrović, J. S.,& Ginjaume, M.. (2019). A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used. in Journal of Radiological Protection, 39(1), 126-135.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aaf456
Carinou E, Kollaard R, Stanković-Petrović JS, Ginjaume M. A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used. in Journal of Radiological Protection. 2019;39(1):126-135.
doi:10.1088/1361-6498/aaf456 .
Carinou, Eleftheria, Kollaard, Robert, Stanković-Petrović, Jelena S., Ginjaume, Merce, "A European survey on the regulatory status for the estimation of the effective dose and the equivalent dose to the lens of the eye when radiation protection garments are used" in Journal of Radiological Protection, 39, no. 1 (2019):126-135,
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aaf456 . .
5
3
6