Arpaci, Alexander

Link to this page

Authority KeyName Variants
3240240e-1ef3-482e-8d6b-2b6349bf478c
  • Arpaci, Alexander (1)
Projects

Author's Bibliography

An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units

Fishbain, Barak; Lerner, Uri; Castell, Nuria; Cole-Hunter, Tom; Popoola, Olalekan; Broday, David M.; Martinez Iniguez, Tania; Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark; Jovašević-Stojanović, Milena; Topalović, Dušan; Jones, Roderic L.; Galea, Karen S.; Etzion, Yael; Kizel, Fadi; Golumbic, Yaela N.; Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet; Yacobi, Tamar; Drahler, Dana; Robinson, Johanna A.; Kocman, David; Horvat, Milena; Svecova, Vlasta; Arpaci, Alexander; Bartonova, Alena

(2017)

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Fishbain, Barak
AU  - Lerner, Uri
AU  - Castell, Nuria
AU  - Cole-Hunter, Tom
AU  - Popoola, Olalekan
AU  - Broday, David M.
AU  - Martinez Iniguez, Tania
AU  - Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark
AU  - Jovašević-Stojanović, Milena
AU  - Topalović, Dušan
AU  - Jones, Roderic L.
AU  - Galea, Karen S.
AU  - Etzion, Yael
AU  - Kizel, Fadi
AU  - Golumbic, Yaela N.
AU  - Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
AU  - Yacobi, Tamar
AU  - Drahler, Dana
AU  - Robinson, Johanna A.
AU  - Kocman, David
AU  - Horvat, Milena
AU  - Svecova, Vlasta
AU  - Arpaci, Alexander
AU  - Bartonova, Alena
PY  - 2017
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1343
AB  - Recent developments in sensory and communication technologies have made the development of portable air-quality (AQ) micro-sensing units (MSUs) feasible. These MSUs allow AQ measurements in many new applications, such as ambulatory exposure analyses and citizen science. Typically, the performance of these devices is assessed using the mean error or correlation coefficients with respect to a laboratory equipment. However, these criteria do not represent how such sensors perform outside of laboratory conditions in large-scale field applications, and do not cover all aspects of possible differences in performance between the sensor-based and standardized equipment, or changes in performance over time. This paper presents a comprehensive Sensor Evaluation Toolbox (SET) for evaluating AQ MSUs by a range of criteria, to better assess their performance in varied applications and environments. Within the SET are included four new schemes for evaluating sensors capability to: locate pollution sources; represent the pollution level on a coarse scale; capture the high temporal variability of the observed pollutant and their reliability. Each of the evaluation criteria allows for assessing sensors performance in a different way, together constituting a holistic evaluation of the suitability and usability of the sensors in a wide range of applications. Application of the SET on measurements acquired by 25MSUs deployed in eight cities across Europe showed that the suggested schemes facilitates a comprehensive cross platform analysis that can be used to determine and compare the sensors performance. The SET was implemented in R and the code is available on the first authors website. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
T2  - Science of the Total Environment
T1  - An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units
VL  - 575
SP  - 639
EP  - 648
DO  - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.061
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Fishbain, Barak and Lerner, Uri and Castell, Nuria and Cole-Hunter, Tom and Popoola, Olalekan and Broday, David M. and Martinez Iniguez, Tania and Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark and Jovašević-Stojanović, Milena and Topalović, Dušan and Jones, Roderic L. and Galea, Karen S. and Etzion, Yael and Kizel, Fadi and Golumbic, Yaela N. and Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet and Yacobi, Tamar and Drahler, Dana and Robinson, Johanna A. and Kocman, David and Horvat, Milena and Svecova, Vlasta and Arpaci, Alexander and Bartonova, Alena",
year = "2017",
abstract = "Recent developments in sensory and communication technologies have made the development of portable air-quality (AQ) micro-sensing units (MSUs) feasible. These MSUs allow AQ measurements in many new applications, such as ambulatory exposure analyses and citizen science. Typically, the performance of these devices is assessed using the mean error or correlation coefficients with respect to a laboratory equipment. However, these criteria do not represent how such sensors perform outside of laboratory conditions in large-scale field applications, and do not cover all aspects of possible differences in performance between the sensor-based and standardized equipment, or changes in performance over time. This paper presents a comprehensive Sensor Evaluation Toolbox (SET) for evaluating AQ MSUs by a range of criteria, to better assess their performance in varied applications and environments. Within the SET are included four new schemes for evaluating sensors capability to: locate pollution sources; represent the pollution level on a coarse scale; capture the high temporal variability of the observed pollutant and their reliability. Each of the evaluation criteria allows for assessing sensors performance in a different way, together constituting a holistic evaluation of the suitability and usability of the sensors in a wide range of applications. Application of the SET on measurements acquired by 25MSUs deployed in eight cities across Europe showed that the suggested schemes facilitates a comprehensive cross platform analysis that can be used to determine and compare the sensors performance. The SET was implemented in R and the code is available on the first authors website. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
title = "An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units",
volume = "575",
pages = "639-648",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.061"
}
Fishbain, B., Lerner, U., Castell, N., Cole-Hunter, T., Popoola, O., Broday, D. M., Martinez Iniguez, T., Nieuwenhuijsen, M., Jovašević-Stojanović, M., Topalović, D., Jones, R. L., Galea, K. S., Etzion, Y., Kizel, F., Golumbic, Y. N., Baram-Tsabari, A., Yacobi, T., Drahler, D., Robinson, J. A., Kocman, D., Horvat, M., Svecova, V., Arpaci, A.,& Bartonova, A.. (2017). An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units. in Science of the Total Environment, 575, 639-648.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.061
Fishbain B, Lerner U, Castell N, Cole-Hunter T, Popoola O, Broday DM, Martinez Iniguez T, Nieuwenhuijsen M, Jovašević-Stojanović M, Topalović D, Jones RL, Galea KS, Etzion Y, Kizel F, Golumbic YN, Baram-Tsabari A, Yacobi T, Drahler D, Robinson JA, Kocman D, Horvat M, Svecova V, Arpaci A, Bartonova A. An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units. in Science of the Total Environment. 2017;575:639-648.
doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.061 .
Fishbain, Barak, Lerner, Uri, Castell, Nuria, Cole-Hunter, Tom, Popoola, Olalekan, Broday, David M., Martinez Iniguez, Tania, Nieuwenhuijsen, Mark, Jovašević-Stojanović, Milena, Topalović, Dušan, Jones, Roderic L., Galea, Karen S., Etzion, Yael, Kizel, Fadi, Golumbic, Yaela N., Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet, Yacobi, Tamar, Drahler, Dana, Robinson, Johanna A., Kocman, David, Horvat, Milena, Svecova, Vlasta, Arpaci, Alexander, Bartonova, Alena, "An evaluation tool kit of air quality micro-sensing units" in Science of the Total Environment, 575 (2017):639-648,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.061 . .
16
65
42
63