TY  - JOUR
AU  - O’Connor, Una M.
AU  - Carinou, Eleftheria
AU  - Clairand, Isabelle
AU  - Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
AU  - de Monte, Francesca
AU  - Domienik-Andrzejewska, Joanna
AU  - Ferrari, Paolo
AU  - Ginjaume, Merce
AU  - Hršak, Hrvoje
AU  - Hupe, Oliver
AU  - Knežević, Željka
AU  - Sans Merce, Marta
AU  - Sarmento, Sandra
AU  - Siiskonen, Teemu
AU  - Vanhavere, Filip
PY  - 2021
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/9863
AB  - Occupational radiation doses from interventional procedures have the potential to be relatively high. The requirement to optimise these doses encourages the use of electronic or active personal dosimeters (APDs) which are now increasingly used in hospitals. They are typically used in tandem with a routine passive dosimetry monitoring programme, with APDs used for real-time readings, for training purposes and when new imaging technology is introduced. However, there are limitations when using APDs. A survey in hospitals to identify issues related to the use of APDs was recently completed, along with an extensive series of APD tests by the EURADOS Working Group 12 on Dosimetry for Medical Imaging. The aim of this review paper is to summarise the state of the art regarding the use of APDs. We also used the results of our survey and our tests to develop a set of recommendations for the use of APDs in the clinical interventional radiology/cardiology settings, and draw attention to some of the current challenges.
T2  - Physica Medica
T1  - Recommendations for the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional workplaces in hospitals
VL  - 87
SP  - 131
EP  - 135
DO  - 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.015
ER  - 

@article{
author = "O’Connor, Una M. and Carinou, Eleftheria and Clairand, Isabelle and Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera and de Monte, Francesca and Domienik-Andrzejewska, Joanna and Ferrari, Paolo and Ginjaume, Merce and Hršak, Hrvoje and Hupe, Oliver and Knežević, Željka and Sans Merce, Marta and Sarmento, Sandra and Siiskonen, Teemu and Vanhavere, Filip",
year = "2021",
abstract = "Occupational radiation doses from interventional procedures have the potential to be relatively high. The requirement to optimise these doses encourages the use of electronic or active personal dosimeters (APDs) which are now increasingly used in hospitals. They are typically used in tandem with a routine passive dosimetry monitoring programme, with APDs used for real-time readings, for training purposes and when new imaging technology is introduced. However, there are limitations when using APDs. A survey in hospitals to identify issues related to the use of APDs was recently completed, along with an extensive series of APD tests by the EURADOS Working Group 12 on Dosimetry for Medical Imaging. The aim of this review paper is to summarise the state of the art regarding the use of APDs. We also used the results of our survey and our tests to develop a set of recommendations for the use of APDs in the clinical interventional radiology/cardiology settings, and draw attention to some of the current challenges.",
journal = "Physica Medica",
title = "Recommendations for the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional workplaces in hospitals",
volume = "87",
pages = "131-135",
doi = "10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.015"
}

O’Connor, U. M., Carinou, E., Clairand, I., Ciraj-Bjelac, O., de Monte, F., Domienik-Andrzejewska, J., Ferrari, P., Ginjaume, M., Hršak, H., Hupe, O., Knežević, Ž., Sans Merce, M., Sarmento, S., Siiskonen, T.,& Vanhavere, F.. (2021). Recommendations for the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional workplaces in hospitals. in Physica Medica, 87, 131-135.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.015

O’Connor UM, Carinou E, Clairand I, Ciraj-Bjelac O, de Monte F, Domienik-Andrzejewska J, Ferrari P, Ginjaume M, Hršak H, Hupe O, Knežević Ž, Sans Merce M, Sarmento S, Siiskonen T, Vanhavere F. Recommendations for the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional workplaces in hospitals. in Physica Medica. 2021;87:131-135.
doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.015 .

O’Connor, Una M., Carinou, Eleftheria, Clairand, Isabelle, Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera, de Monte, Francesca, Domienik-Andrzejewska, Joanna, Ferrari, Paolo, Ginjaume, Merce, Hršak, Hrvoje, Hupe, Oliver, Knežević, Željka, Sans Merce, Marta, Sarmento, Sandra, Siiskonen, Teemu, Vanhavere, Filip, "Recommendations for the use of active personal dosemeters (APDs) in interventional workplaces in hospitals" in Physica Medica, 87 (2021):131-135,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.015 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Carinou, Eleftheria
AU  - Ferrari, Paolo
AU  - Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera
AU  - Gingaume, Merce
AU  - Merce, Marta Sans
AU  - O'Connor, Una
PY  - 2015
UR  - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/732
AB  - A thorough literature review about the current situation on the implementation of eye lens monitoring has been performed in order to provide recommendations regarding dosemeter types, calibration procedures and practical aspects of eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel. Most relevant data and recommendations from about 100 papers have been analysed and classified in the following topics: challenges of today in eye lens monitoring; conversion coefficients, phantoms and calibration procedures for eye lens dose evaluation; correction factors and dosemeters for eye lens dose measurements; dosemeter position and influence of protective devices. The major findings of the review can be summarised as follows: the recommended operational quantity for the eye lens monitoring is H-p(3). At present, several dosemeters are available for eye lens monitoring and calibration procedures are being developed. However, in practice, very often, alternative methods are used to assess the dose to the eye lens. A summary of correction factors found in the literature for the assessment of the eye lens dose is provided. These factors can give an estimation of the eye lens dose when alternative methods, such as the use of a whole body dosemeter, are used. A wide range of values is found, thus indicating the large uncertainty associated with these simplified methods. Reduction factors from most common protective devices obtained experimentally and using Monte Carlo calculations are presented. The paper concludes that the use of a dosemeter placed at collar level outside the lead apron can provide a useful first estimate of the eye lens exposure. However, for workplaces with estimated annual equivalent dose to the eye lens close to the dose limit, specific eye lens monitoring should be performed. Finally, training of the involved medical staff on the risks of ionising radiation for the eye lens and on the correct use of protective systems is strongly recommended.
T2  - Journal of Radiological Protection
T1  - Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H-p(3) monitoring. A 2015 review
VL  - 35
IS  - 3
SP  - R17
EP  - R34
DO  - 10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Carinou, Eleftheria and Ferrari, Paolo and Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera and Gingaume, Merce and Merce, Marta Sans and O'Connor, Una",
year = "2015",
abstract = "A thorough literature review about the current situation on the implementation of eye lens monitoring has been performed in order to provide recommendations regarding dosemeter types, calibration procedures and practical aspects of eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel. Most relevant data and recommendations from about 100 papers have been analysed and classified in the following topics: challenges of today in eye lens monitoring; conversion coefficients, phantoms and calibration procedures for eye lens dose evaluation; correction factors and dosemeters for eye lens dose measurements; dosemeter position and influence of protective devices. The major findings of the review can be summarised as follows: the recommended operational quantity for the eye lens monitoring is H-p(3). At present, several dosemeters are available for eye lens monitoring and calibration procedures are being developed. However, in practice, very often, alternative methods are used to assess the dose to the eye lens. A summary of correction factors found in the literature for the assessment of the eye lens dose is provided. These factors can give an estimation of the eye lens dose when alternative methods, such as the use of a whole body dosemeter, are used. A wide range of values is found, thus indicating the large uncertainty associated with these simplified methods. Reduction factors from most common protective devices obtained experimentally and using Monte Carlo calculations are presented. The paper concludes that the use of a dosemeter placed at collar level outside the lead apron can provide a useful first estimate of the eye lens exposure. However, for workplaces with estimated annual equivalent dose to the eye lens close to the dose limit, specific eye lens monitoring should be performed. Finally, training of the involved medical staff on the risks of ionising radiation for the eye lens and on the correct use of protective systems is strongly recommended.",
journal = "Journal of Radiological Protection",
title = "Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H-p(3) monitoring. A 2015 review",
volume = "35",
number = "3",
pages = "R17-R34",
doi = "10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17"
}

Carinou, E., Ferrari, P., Ciraj-Bjelac, O., Gingaume, M., Merce, M. S.,& O'Connor, U.. (2015). Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H-p(3) monitoring. A 2015 review. in Journal of Radiological Protection, 35(3), R17-R34.
https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17

Carinou E, Ferrari P, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Gingaume M, Merce MS, O'Connor U. Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H-p(3) monitoring. A 2015 review. in Journal of Radiological Protection. 2015;35(3):R17-R34.
doi:10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17 .

Carinou, Eleftheria, Ferrari, Paolo, Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera, Gingaume, Merce, Merce, Marta Sans, O'Connor, Una, "Eye lens monitoring for interventional radiology personnel: dosemeters, calibration and practical aspects of H-p(3) monitoring. A 2015 review" in Journal of Radiological Protection, 35, no. 3 (2015):R17-R34,
https://doi.org/10.1088/0952-4746/35/3/R17 . .