Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorJarvinen, Hannu
dc.creatorFarah, Jad
dc.creatorSiiskonen, Teemu
dc.creatorCiraj-Bjelac, Olivera
dc.creatorDabin, Jeremie
dc.creatorCarinou, Eleftheria
dc.creatorDomienik-Andrzejewska, Joanna
dc.creatorKluszczynski, Dariusz
dc.creatorKnežević, Željka
dc.creatorKopec, Renata
dc.creatorMajer, Marija
dc.creatorMalchair, Francoise
dc.creatorNegri, Anna
dc.creatorPankowski, Piotr
dc.creatorSarmento, Sandra
dc.creatorTrianni, Annalisa
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-21T09:04:40Z
dc.date.available2018-05-21T09:04:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1120-1797
dc.identifier.issn1724-191X
dc.identifier.urihttps://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/7621
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The feasibility of setting-up generic, hospital-independent dose alert levels to initiate vigilance on possible skin injuries in interventional procedures was studied for three high-dose procedures (chemoembolization (TACE) of the liver, neuro-embolization (NE) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)) in 9 European countries. Methods: Gafchromic (R) films and thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used to determine the Maximum Skin Dose (MSD). Correlation of the online dose indicators (fluoroscopy time, kerma- or dose-area product (KAP or DAP) and cumulative air kerma at interventional reference point (K-a,K-r)) with MSD was evaluated and used to establish the alert levels corresponding to a MSD of 2 Gy and 5 Gy. The uncertainties of alert levels in terms of DAP and K-a,K-r, and uncertainty of MSD were calculated. Results: About 20-30% of all MSD values exceeded 2 Gy while only 2-6% exceeded 5 Gy. The correlations suggest that both DAP and K-a,K-r can be used as a dose indicator for alert levels (Pearson correlation coefficient p mostly > 0.8), while fluoroscopy time is not suitable (p mostly < 0.6). Generic alert levels based on DAP (Gy cm(2)) were suggested for MSD of both 2 Gy and 5 Gy (for 5 Gy: TACE 750, PCI 250 and NE 400). The suggested levels are close to the lowest values published in several other studies. The uncertainty of the MSD was estimated to be around 10-15% and of hospital-specific skin dose alert levels about 20-30% (with coverage factor k = 1). Conclusions: The generic alert levels are feasible for some cases but should be used with caution, only as the first approximation, while hospital-specific alert levels are preferred as the final approach.en
dc.relationEuropean Radiation Dosimetry Group [EURADOS WG 12 - Dosimetry in Medical Imaging]
dc.rightsrestrictedAccess
dc.sourcePhysica Medica
dc.subjectInterventional radiology
dc.subjectMaximum skin dose
dc.subjectOnlin
dc.subjectskin dose alert levelen
dc.titleFeasibility of setting up generic alert levels for maximum skin dose in fluoroscopically guided proceduresen
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.licenseARR
dcterms.abstractТрианни, Aнналиса; Дабин, Јéрéмие; Домиеник-Aндрзејеwска, Јоанна; Клусзцзyнски, Дариусз; Кнежевић, Жељка; Копец, Рената; Мајер, Марија; Малцхаир, Францоисе; Негри, Aнна; Панкоwски, Пиотр; Сарменто, Сандра; Цариноу, Елефтхериа; Јарвинен, Ханну; Фарах, Јад; Сиисконен, Теему; Цирај-Бјелац, Оливера;
dc.citation.volume46
dc.citation.spage67
dc.citation.epage74
dc.identifier.wos000427424700009
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.01.010
dc.citation.rankM22
dc.identifier.pmid29519411
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85043282385


Документи

Thumbnail

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу