Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients
Нема приказа
Аутори
Jablanovic, DragoslavCiraj-Bjelac, Olivera
Damjanov, Nemanja
Seric, Srdjan
Radak-Perović, Marija
Aranđić, Danijela
Maksimović, Ružica
Чланак у часопису
Метаподаци
Приказ свих података о документуАпстракт
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the image quality and dose to patients in the radiography of sacroiliac joints and to perform a clinical comparative study of digital and conventional screen-film radiography. Routine radiography of sacroiliac joint was performed in 60 patients using digital and screen-film radiography. The visibility of five anatomical regions and the overall image quality were rated by experienced radiologists. Patient dose assessment in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was performed. The digital system showed slightly improved visualisation of specific anatomical structures. Overall image quality was significantly better in the digital when compared with the screen-film imaging system. The average ESAK was 2.4 mGy in screen-film and 3.6 mGy in digital radiography. The digital radiography provided equal or better visibility of anatomical details and overall image quality, but on higher dose levels. Therefore, the practice on digital systems must be o...ptimised.
Извор:
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2013, 155, 1, 88-95Финансирање / пројекти:
- Нове технологије за мониторинг и заштиту животног окружења од штетних хемијских супстанци и радијационог оптерећења (RS-MESTD-Integrated and Interdisciplinary Research (IIR or III)-43009)
- Дијастолна срчана инсуфицијенција у кардиомиопатијама, дијабетесу, болестима перикарда и плућној хипертензији: дијагностички критеријуми, стратификација ризика и терапијски модалитети (RS-MESTD-Basic Research (BR or ON)-175080)
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs315
ISSN: 0144-8420
PubMed: 23185070
WoS: 000320274900011
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84878947125
Колекције
Институција/група
VinčaTY - JOUR AU - Jablanovic, Dragoslav AU - Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera AU - Damjanov, Nemanja AU - Seric, Srdjan AU - Radak-Perović, Marija AU - Aranđić, Danijela AU - Maksimović, Ružica PY - 2013 UR - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/5543 AB - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the image quality and dose to patients in the radiography of sacroiliac joints and to perform a clinical comparative study of digital and conventional screen-film radiography. Routine radiography of sacroiliac joint was performed in 60 patients using digital and screen-film radiography. The visibility of five anatomical regions and the overall image quality were rated by experienced radiologists. Patient dose assessment in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was performed. The digital system showed slightly improved visualisation of specific anatomical structures. Overall image quality was significantly better in the digital when compared with the screen-film imaging system. The average ESAK was 2.4 mGy in screen-film and 3.6 mGy in digital radiography. The digital radiography provided equal or better visibility of anatomical details and overall image quality, but on higher dose levels. Therefore, the practice on digital systems must be optimised. T2 - Radiation Protection Dosimetry T1 - Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients VL - 155 IS - 1 SP - 88 EP - 95 DO - 10.1093/rpd/ncs315 ER -
@article{ author = "Jablanovic, Dragoslav and Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera and Damjanov, Nemanja and Seric, Srdjan and Radak-Perović, Marija and Aranđić, Danijela and Maksimović, Ružica", year = "2013", abstract = "The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the image quality and dose to patients in the radiography of sacroiliac joints and to perform a clinical comparative study of digital and conventional screen-film radiography. Routine radiography of sacroiliac joint was performed in 60 patients using digital and screen-film radiography. The visibility of five anatomical regions and the overall image quality were rated by experienced radiologists. Patient dose assessment in terms of entrance surface air kerma (ESAK) was performed. The digital system showed slightly improved visualisation of specific anatomical structures. Overall image quality was significantly better in the digital when compared with the screen-film imaging system. The average ESAK was 2.4 mGy in screen-film and 3.6 mGy in digital radiography. The digital radiography provided equal or better visibility of anatomical details and overall image quality, but on higher dose levels. Therefore, the practice on digital systems must be optimised.", journal = "Radiation Protection Dosimetry", title = "Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients", volume = "155", number = "1", pages = "88-95", doi = "10.1093/rpd/ncs315" }
Jablanovic, D., Ciraj-Bjelac, O., Damjanov, N., Seric, S., Radak-Perović, M., Aranđić, D.,& Maksimović, R.. (2013). Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients. in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 155(1), 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs315
Jablanovic D, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Damjanov N, Seric S, Radak-Perović M, Aranđić D, Maksimović R. Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients. in Radiation Protection Dosimetry. 2013;155(1):88-95. doi:10.1093/rpd/ncs315 .
Jablanovic, Dragoslav, Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera, Damjanov, Nemanja, Seric, Srdjan, Radak-Perović, Marija, Aranđić, Danijela, Maksimović, Ružica, "Screen-film versus digital radiography of sacroiliac joints: evaluation of image quality and dose to patients" in Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 155, no. 1 (2013):88-95, https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncs315 . .