Calibration of Routine Dosimeters in Radiation Processing: Validation Procedure for In-Plant Calibration
Abstract
The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%.... The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation.
Keywords:
radiation processing / cobalt-60 / dosimetry / in-plant calibrationSource:
Nuclear technology and radiation protection, 2011, 26, 3, 271-274Funding / projects:
- Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia [143016]
DOI: 10.2298/NTRP1103271S
ISSN: 1451-3994
WoS: 000298726200015
Scopus: 2-s2.0-84857004617
Collections
Institution/Community
VinčaTY - JOUR AU - Šećerov, Bojana Lj. AU - Bačić, Goran G. PY - 2011 UR - https://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4635 AB - The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%. The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation. T2 - Nuclear technology and radiation protection T1 - Calibration of Routine Dosimeters in Radiation Processing: Validation Procedure for In-Plant Calibration VL - 26 IS - 3 SP - 271 EP - 274 DO - 10.2298/NTRP1103271S ER -
@article{ author = "Šećerov, Bojana Lj. and Bačić, Goran G.", year = "2011", abstract = "The essential prerequisite of radiation dosimetry is to provide quality assurance and documentation that the irradiation procedure has been carried out according to the specification requirement of correct calibration of the chosen dosimetry system. At the Radiation Plant of the Vinca Institute of Nuclear Sciences we compared two recommended protocols of irradiation procedures in the calibration of dosimetry systems in radiation processing: (1) by irradiation of routine dosimeters (ethanol-chlorobenzene - ECB) at the calibration laboratory and (2), by in-plant calibration with alanine transfer - dosimeters. The critical point for in-plant calibration is irradiation geometry, so we carefully positioned the phantom carrying both dosimeters in order to minimize dose gradients across the sample. The analysis of results obtained showed that the difference among determined absorbed doses for the construction of calibration curves between these two methods, (alanine vs. ECB), is less than 1%. The difference in combined standard uncertainty for each calibration procedure is 0.1%. These results demonstrate that our in-plant calibration is as good as calibration by irradiation at the calibration laboratory and validates our placement of the irradiation phantom during irradiation.", journal = "Nuclear technology and radiation protection", title = "Calibration of Routine Dosimeters in Radiation Processing: Validation Procedure for In-Plant Calibration", volume = "26", number = "3", pages = "271-274", doi = "10.2298/NTRP1103271S" }
Šećerov, B. Lj.,& Bačić, G. G.. (2011). Calibration of Routine Dosimeters in Radiation Processing: Validation Procedure for In-Plant Calibration. in Nuclear technology and radiation protection, 26(3), 271-274. https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP1103271S
Šećerov BL, Bačić GG. Calibration of Routine Dosimeters in Radiation Processing: Validation Procedure for In-Plant Calibration. in Nuclear technology and radiation protection. 2011;26(3):271-274. doi:10.2298/NTRP1103271S .
Šećerov, Bojana Lj., Bačić, Goran G., "Calibration of Routine Dosimeters in Radiation Processing: Validation Procedure for In-Plant Calibration" in Nuclear technology and radiation protection, 26, no. 3 (2011):271-274, https://doi.org/10.2298/NTRP1103271S . .