Приказ основних података о документу

dc.creatorCiraj-Bjelac, Olivera
dc.creatorRehani, Madan M.
dc.creatorSim, Kui Hian
dc.creatorLiew, Houng Bang
dc.creatorVano, Eliseo
dc.creatorKleiman, Norman J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-01T21:30:28Z
dc.date.available2018-03-01T21:30:28Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.issn1522-726X
dc.identifier.urihttps://vinar.vin.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/4157
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To examine the prevalence of radiation-associated lens opacities among interventional cardiologists and nurses and correlate with occupational radiation exposure. Background: Interventional cardiology personnel are exposed to relatively high levels of X-rays and based on recent findings of radiation-associated lens opacities in other cohorts, they may be at risk for cataract without use of ocular radiation protection. Methods: Eyes of interventional cardiologists, nurses, and age-and sex-matched unexposed controls were screened by dilated slit lamp examination and posterior lens changes graded using a modified Merriam-Focht technique. Individual cumulative lens X-ray exposure was calculated from responses to a questionnaire and personal interview. Results: The prevalence of radiation-associated posterior lens opacities was 52% (29/56, 95% CI: 35-73) for interventional cardiologists, 45% (5/11, 95% CI: 15-100) for nurses, and 9% (2/22, 95% CI: 1-33) for controls. Relative risks of lens opacity was 5.7 (95% CI: 1.5-22) for interventional cardiologists and 5.0 (95% CI: 1.2-21) for nurses. Estimated cumulative ocular doses ranged from 0.01 to 43 Gy with mean and median values of 3.4 and 1.0 Gy, respectively. A strong dose-response relationship was found between occupational exposure and the prevalence of radiation-associated posterior lens changes. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a dose dependent increased risk of posterior lens opacities for interventional cardiologists and nurses when radiation protection tools are not used. While study of a larger cohort is needed to confirm these findings, the results suggest ocular radio-protection should be utilized. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en
dc.rightsrestrictedAccessen
dc.sourceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventionsen
dc.subjectcardiac catheterizationen
dc.subjectfluoroscopyen
dc.subjectoccupational exposureen
dc.subjectposterior subcapsular cataract (psc)en
dc.subjectlens opacityen
dc.titleRisk for Radiation-Induced Cataract for Staff in Interventional Cardiology: Is There Reason for Concern?en
dc.typearticleen
dcterms.abstractРехани, Мадан М.; Сим, Куи Хиан; Лиеw, Хоунг Банг; Цирај-Бјелац Оливера; Вано, Елисео; Клеиман, Норман Ј.;
dc.citation.volume76
dc.citation.issue6
dc.citation.spage826
dc.citation.epage834
dc.identifier.wos000284676100010
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.22670
dc.citation.rankM22
dc.identifier.pmid20549683
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77957078918


Документи

ДатотекеВеличинаФорматПреглед

Уз овај запис нема датотека.

Овај документ се појављује у следећим колекцијама

Приказ основних података о документу